In the case of Sony’s mirrorless A6000, one of the highlights of this test was that the hybrid autofocus system was able to follow a slowly moving object with a single-frame mode and a single-car focus much more reliably than a fast-moving subject with serial mode and continuous tracking. It is also striking that the hit rate hardly seemed to depend on the light conditions. The 13 single images the Sony A6000 achieved during the 7.5 second drive of the chart with single-AF, the average of 87% (2500 lux) and 84% (300 lux) of the best possible MFT contrast. For a faster object and continuous in the darkened laboratory, 25% to 72%.
The K-3 II was not able to build on the successes of the single-AF even with series with a continuous autofocus: although it belonged to the fastest cameras with 14 (2500 Lux) or 13 pictures per 3-second series (300 Lux) , But the MFT50 contrast was average at only 70% (2500 lux) and 69% (300 lux), ie 30% and 31%, respectively, below the optimum, more precisely below the value of the perfectly focused reference image. In the end, this was enough for a midfield position.
The 12 or 11 pictures of the two 3-second series produced in the test were on average 59 (2500 Lux) and 67% (300 Lux) Almost more blurred than the corresponding recordings. We had reduced the serial image speed so that the hybrid autofocus could take a little longer.
The best image of the 2500-Lux series came only to 63%, with Sony Sony, although four hits with over 80%, followed by two more drastic bats with only 17% and 28%. Overall, only a place in the lower midfield for Sony.
No comments:
Post a Comment